shopping cartCART
Share |
MORE ARTICLES ON HOMEPAGE >>
Posted On: 11/4/2008

What the 2008 campaign taught communicators
By Michael Sebastian
michaels@ragan.com

Fifteen lessons from the longest and most expensive presidential campaign in U.S. history

Let’s be honest, the 2008 presidential election hasn’t been historic, it’s been earth shattering. Historians will measure every other campaign B.E.2008 and A.E.2008—that’s Before Election and After Election.

It has been the longest and most expensive race; it featured two strong women of two very different and opposing backgrounds; it pitted the oldest presidential candidate against the first black candidate; and it left communicators with plenty of speeches to celebrate, criticize and dissect.

“I think there has been some thrilling rhetoric in this race—rhetoric that has brought tears to my eyes and made me laugh out loud,” said former White House speechwriter Ken Askew. “Some of the speeches have been very engaging intellectually.”

Since any election is an exercise in communications, embodying everything corporate communications from PR to speechwriting, Ragan.com interviewed six communicators to learn the most important lessons the campaign taught us.

So with no further ado, the longest and most expensive and most earth-shattering election ever—in 15 easy lessons.

1 Social media is here to stay.

You know the executives that balk at implementing social media campaigns, well Barack Obama and John McCain showed that social media is no passing fad. Both candidates embraced blogs, social networks and Web video.

“These presidential campaigns are always trying to innovate and try the latest, greatest and best ways to activate their grassroots constituencies,” explained Washington D.C.-based PR pro Geoff Livingston. “And so for them to use social media tools as heavily as they have is to legitimize it.”

2 Tap into social networks.

The Obama campaign created a social network, MyBarackObama, on its official Web site. Members of that network at times criticized the candidate over his various positions. Livingston called this an ideal model for large corporate organizations.

“If you can’t control your local people or your retail chain (for instance, a large charity or an automobile manufacturer with dealerships all over the place) who might be communicating or blogging on social networks then give them the tools to communicate. Enable them with the brand; don’t control them,” he explained.

3 Don’t sequester your executive.

sarah palin The McCain campaign stirred pandemonium in its conservative supporters and created buzz among undecided voters when Sarah Palin joined the ticket. And then the campaign built a wall around her. She sat for very few interviews; did far fewer public appearances than her running mate or rivals and rarely took questions from reporters on the campaign trail.

Bad idea, say many speechwriters and PR pros.

“The opening was good, but then they shoved the rook out to be taken by a pawn,” explained Joan Hope, a former campaign communicator from Alaska. “It was just a dumb move.”

Hope suggested that the McCain campaign tried to shape her into something she is not. “She was pressured to learn to parrot what they taught, and then turned loose and told to act like a world leader,” Hope said.

Livingston believes sequestering Palin, or any executive, is a bonehead idea. “[The McCain campaign] basically said, ‘Stop talking to the public,’ and put her in a corner and hid her,” he explained.

“And what that’s done is put great pressure on her being successful.”

4 Portray your female executive as tough in her own way—don’t adopt a masculine mystique.

Hillary clintonBetween Hillary Clinton and Palin, women made their mark on this election and it will resonate through the corporate world. Women needn’t look and act like men to be successful.

“These are two women [Clinton and Palin], both politically aggressive and eager for their own success, with completely different styles,” explained Hope. “One plays into the role expected, the other plays to the populist; both styles are engaging and obviously capable of instilling loyalty in their followers.”

5 Say no to the Big Formal Speech.

The former chief speechwriter to President Carter, James Fallows, wrote in The Atlantic Monthly, “Repeatedly during this campaign, [Obama] has gotten himself out of serious political or policy problems with the ‘big formal speech.’” For instance, Obama talked his way out the Rev. Jeremiah Wright controversy with his race relations speech.

Will Obama inspire your executive to deliver a “big formal speech” when there is a problem with employee morale or stakeholder unrest? It shouldn’t, said former Al Gore speechwriter Robert Lehrman.

“If people watch Roger Federer, will they play [tennis] any better?” he asked. “The things that make political speeches dull won’t be fixed by a good example.” And neither will dull corporate speeches. Unless your executive has preternatural speaking skills, don’t let him or her give a “big formal speech.”

6 Don’t forget the power of a good story.

Weaving stories into a speech is a basic tenet of speechwriting. Former Bush speechwriter Matt Scully worked a story into Palin’s speech at the RNC, while Huckabee finished his address with an effective parable.

“Both should remind people how powerful the illuminating or inspirational story is in speechwriting,” Lehrman explained.

“That’s something Obama’s writers could do more.”

7 PowerPoint is mainstream.

At the RNC, a digital background behind the speakers sometimes showed a waving flag and other times displayed various stirring images of patriotism.

“I think this is the first time you have seen the effects of PowerPoint finally hit the mainstream,” explained former Fred Thompson speechwriter Mike Long. “And while that’s obviously not how we use PowerPoint, we have grown accustom to more than a song—we’re expecting a song and dance.”

That digital screen is the first step toward satisfying a growing audience expectation to see and hear speeches. So start thinking of your speeches visually.

By the way, that’s good news for freelancers who charge by the hour because then they bill time for not only writing but also finding images; for salaried speechwriters, that means more work for the same amount of money.

8 Acknowledge the other side is right.

During the first presidential debate, Obama agreed with McCain on several points. In fact, the McCain campaign made an attack ad that showed the many times Obama said, “He is right.”

A perceived weakness by Republicans, Lehrman instead called it a classic way to persuade undecided voters.

“It makes you appear moderate,” he said. “McCain was wrong to use that in an ad. He just shot himself in the foot. That ad just makes more undecideds see Obama as a reasonable guy.”

If a trade group, union, competitor or consumers make statements about your company—and you agree with them—don’t disagree, instead insist they are right and build off the consensus. As Lehrman noted, it will make your executive and the company look reasonable.

9 The teleprompter killed the stump-speech star?

“Authenticity and substance on the stump has disappeared,” explained Askew. “I believe very strongly in the carefully crafted speeches, but there seems to be a lack of authenticity in terms of face-to-face communication on the campaign trail and that is disturbing” though nothing new.

He blamed it partly on the sudden surge in teleprompter use on the campaign trail. Both candidates, Obama in particular, read from teleprompters as they addressed crowds around the country.

Ian Griffin, a former executive communicator with HP, thinks there’s nothing wrong with the teleprompter if they’re used correctly. “They’re a tool just like slides or note cards,” he said. “The trick is not to be overly reliant on any one vehicle.”

In fact, Griffin recommends speechwriters resist the urge to rewrite an executive’s stump speech.

“There is a tendency in corporate communications to get bored with the message and change it before the outer reaches of the organizations have really absorbed it,” he said. “It’s a challenge for the corporate communicators not to change it around.”

Do not change the content, but do make sure the message is fresh. As a speechwriter, enliven the material with a new story for each location your executive visits and help your speaker improve each time he speaks.

10 Blend litany and concrete detail in your speeches.

Remember Obama’s speech after he lost the New Hampshire primary to Clinton? He delivered a 15-minute speech that repeated two litanies: “There is something happening,” which started the speech, and “Yes we can,” which closed it.

Between those lines of the speech, Obama told stories of Americans and the challenges they face.

“Obama’s use of litany and concrete detail is really unusual,” explained Lehrman. “It’s not unique—and no different than his 2004 Democratic Convention keynote.”

In fact, as Lehrman noted, blending litany and detail is no different than Mike Huckabee’s speech to the RNC. In it, Huckabee addressed certain groups of people and repeated the line, “You want something to change.”

11 The person who tries something new wins.

Both Obama and McCain paved new roads with their campaigns, Long explained. Obama banked on voter turnout among people in their 20s, a gamble that didn’t pay off in past elections; McCain continually jump started his campaign—picking Palin, suspending his campaign—when Obama widened his lead in the polls.

Both men tried new strategies for their campaigns.

“That’s a real lesson for communicators and it’s a hard lesson for managers because what it says is let the guy with the new ideas have some space,” Long said. “The Clinton campaign is a good example of the manager that follows the slow and easy until it fails.”

12 The idea speech is alive and well.

The formal speeches of both party’s conventions were impressive, Askew noted. He characterized these as “idea speeches.”

“A good speech always has an idea—though not every idea is a good one—and an idea is an imagination contagion,” Askew explained. “Something that pierces the imagination and attracts the attention of the listener, who turns the idea over in his head and shares it and by then it becomes personal.

“In a political race people will forgive a lack of details if they have an idea.”

13 Write for the sound bite.

This one is obvious, but it grows more important each year.

“Speechwriters are obviously very savvy about this,” said Griffin. “You might make a 30-minute speech but you have to have a sound bite or two to make the evening news.”

Don’t expect the continued importance of sound bites to change.

“Presidential politics is marketing,” Long explained. “That doesn’t mean the death of big ideas or the death of big speeches; that just means that more and more of the campaign—corporate or political— will be focused on the forwarding of ideas as entertainment.”

14 Beware of high-flown rhetoric.

The average American is suspicious of too much rhetoric, Griffin observed. For instance, the McCain campaign drew blood on Obama for his Ivy League elitism.

“I think speechwriters need to bear in mind that you can’t put too much high-flown rhetoric in the mouth of an average executive without making them sound too flowery,” Griffin explained. “The main thing is authenticity.”

If your executive is a meat-and-potatoes kind of guy or gal, then write that way; don’t feed them high rhetoric just because you can.

15 Your job security looks good.

Agree with him or not, Obama ranks among the finest orators in American politics today—maybe in modern U.S. history. He thrilled and moved enormous crowds and TV viewers with his speeches, invoking comparisons to Martin Luther King Jr. and John F. Kennedy.

If your executives paid attention— and they did—then perhaps it renewed their interest in the power of public speaking. “That’s splendid news for a person like me because it means he thinks speaking is worthwhile,” said Long.

Article comments:
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 10:28:12 AM by bill roma
There were a lot of lessons learned that you didn't discuss such as campaign fraud, mis handling of funds, illegal fund raising, etc. When the media becomes part of the story as the liberal press did this election, we all loose.
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 10:52:00 AM by Robin
"If you're executives paid attention..."

I hope you do better work for your (or is that you're?) clients.
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 10:57:53 AM by Ellen
ROFLMAO!!!! The election isn't even over yet and already the "liberal" media is being "blamed" for whatever the results are.. By "liberal" media, I guess Bill Roma means Fox News? LOL
How about these 3 examples of voter fraud:
1) Flyers in Virginia tell Democratic voters that their day to vote is Nov 5.
2) Another example of lies and intimidation from Virginia:
Telling college students that they will lose financial aid if they vote in their college town instead of at home.
3) Telling people they can vote by phone.
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 11:01:28 AM by Sara
Wow - what negativity on what should be a happy day for all patriots. Let's remember the focus of this piece is for communicators, not politicos. To the writer: Very interesting points - and I agree with all of them. Thanks for your thoughts on this!
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 11:30:40 AM by Lew F
Thank you. A very effective list for communication challenges at all levels.
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 11:33:34 AM by Kim
I agree that the speaker needs to have innate talent at speaking! Although Obama is a better speaker than McCain, he isn't Martin Luther King - he could have been - but he never really let loose and that's why I can't quite crown him as historic! He is a master of the teleprompter not delivery.
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 11:34:30 AM by Ragan's Editorial Team
Robin, thanks for the catch.
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 12:22:34 PM by Anonymous
Sarah Palin sequestered? I don't think so. She's been everywhere from interviews with Katie Couric and Charles Gibson to Saturday Night Live. Where the heck is Joe Biden though? Hidden away by the Democratic Party so he doesn't make anymore gaffes!
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 1:19:01 PM by Anonymous
Without further ado, not adieu (goodbye!)
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 1:30:00 PM by Anonymous
I agree with all of the points made in this article - thank you. I wish that more people understood the communications aspect to all of the campaigning that we have witnessed, including our executives and colleagues.

There is a lot of "behind the scenes fancy footwork," that we as communicators understand and can see through, unfortunately most of this is missed by the general public. In this case, I would hope that the person who possesses the ability to run a country prevails and not the smoke and mirrors.

The rise with new media and communications mediums has enabled candidates to appear more powerful, memorable and historic. As communicators we only have ourselves to blame (or thank).
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 3:31:20 PM by Anonymous
Great article. Very interesting!

As for Bill Roma's comments, when you are trying to go on a nice tirade, it is a good idea to spell check those tough words first, e.g. "loose" means not tight, I think what you meant to say was lose, which means not to win. Obviously, people who blame the "liberal media" for all their woes have difficulty with spelling.
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 4:38:50 PM by Pablo
Me gusta numero ocho mas que otros.
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 4:56:29 PM by MaryanneJ
You forgot research. With everyone being able to check facts in a few minutes, using a patent falsehood (e.g., comprehensive sex ed) will come back in your face faster than a rake hidden in the grass.

Get permission and consent. I suspect McCain lost a few young voters when pop icons protested the use of their songs at Republican rallies. Getting permission from the recording label isn't enough. And using people without their consent isn't cool either.
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 6:08:18 PM by Michael Sebastian
Maryanne, nice addition. Make it 16 lessons for communicators.
Wednesday, November 05, 2008 11:08:22 AM by Terra Hoskins

It's not that Obama is a better speaker than McCain, he's a different kind of speaker. I thought each were effective when playing to their presentation strengths. Obama can stir a crowd and move the masses and McCain relates on a more personal level. Good to keep in mind when considering how to put your execs out there.
Wednesday, November 05, 2008 11:51:43 AM by Jay
"Sarah Palin joined the ticket. And then the campaign built a wall around her. She sat for very few interviews did far fewer public appearances than her running mate or rivals and rarely took questions from reporters on the campaign trail."

This is factually incorrect. After a slow and rocky start, Palin was actually doing more interviews, press conferences and media opportunities then either Obama or Biden over the last month of the campaign.
Wednesday, November 05, 2008 12:20:29 PM by Michael Sebastian
Jay, In the last month leading up to election day Palin became more and more available to the press. She held informal press conferences on her campaign airplane and on tarmacs. She also sat for interviews with CNN and The Chicago Tribune, to name two, in the final days and weeks of the campaign.

However, there is no question that the McCain campaign built a wall around Palin when she was introduced to the nation. And, as we know, first impressions are the most lasting.

Was Palin more accessible to reporters than Obama, Biden and ,yes, even McCain in the final weeks of the campaign? Yes. Was it too late? Absolutely.

Morale of the story: Don't sequester your executive.
Wednesday, November 05, 2008 12:53:48 PM by Jay
Fair point, and I'm not saying the advice is wrong. I just thought it was inaccurate to characterize it the way you did a little too broad and general.

I think we could make the case that once Obama and Biden thought they had the election in the bag, they went into press lockdown to avoid gaffes and getting pinned down on key topics.

In which case the strategy is the opposite of what you suggested once you've made the sale, shut up.
Wednesday, November 05, 2008 1:31:45 PM by interested Alaskan
On building a wall around Palin and the advice not to, I think her "handlers" were in a tough spot. She was well-versed in the fish escapements and gasline projects of Alaska, but not in complex world conflicts. Hearing her say Sakashvily for the first time made me cringe. She did a good job faking her knowledge and cramming to learn about it. But her answers were only 1 level deep. There is no way she could debate world affairs as Obama and McCain did during their first debate. It can be learned over time, but you have to read and absorb and think. They were right to keep her off limits. She could have done much more damage.
Wednesday, November 05, 2008 2:05:12 PM by Rod Hise
Thoughts on the fundamental communications lesson from Mr. McCain's campaign: http://tinyurl.com/562ohd.
Wednesday, November 05, 2008 2:12:17 PM by KBergh
I agree with most of these, but want to point out:
(1) Obama benefitted greatly from his Big Formal Speeches...right thing, right way, in his case, IMHO (2) Obama's speechwriters must have caught on to the "power of the good story" because his narrative about the 106-year-old black woman voter at the end of his acceptance speech last night should have certainly softened even the most cynical among us (3) I wish that Sarah Palin's handlers could have sequestered her...the GOP's choice to put Sarah Palin on the ticket backfired horribly...no matter how you presented her, she sounded like a bohunk. I was shocked how her handlers not only miscalculated her lack of preparation or experience, but discounted what a poor communicator she was...her syntax during interviews and stump speeches was inexcusable (for a fellow journalism major, especially) and her antagonistic campaign trail comments came across as fundamentalist rhetoric (suicide in American politics).
Wednesday, November 05, 2008 3:39:25 PM by Jay
Oh another lesson learned: racism is out but sexism is fine.
Wednesday, November 05, 2008 9:15:17 PM by MIssy Blankenship
Thank you for a very good article. I am sorry, though, that a "communication" piece was dragged into a political commentary. May I suggest that you not allow "Anonymous" posters in the future. I liken an anonymous opinion or comment to someone writing me a check and neglecting to sign it.
Thursday, November 06, 2008 11:59:50 AM by Michael Sebastian
Jay, You're probably right. It was perhaps too broad a stroke in terms of Palin. I hope the point of that lesson wasn't lost.

Missy, you've touched on a debate that we at Ragan have not only visited and revisited, but other media companies and corporate Web sites have certainly take on as well.
Saturday, November 08, 2008 8:25:44 PM by CathyMac
That the media's now asking, "Who is this president elect?, What's he going to do now?" (see CNN/Fox news) says quite a bit about the power of communications. Our nation has just elected a president they don't even know!

Comment on this article
 
Your name
 
Name 
E-mail 
All the fields are optional
Ragan.com moderates comments and reserves the right to remove posts that are abusive or otherwise inappropriate.
 
Type the characters you see below.
 
RELATED STORIES
RELATED PRODUCTS

Home | Internal Communication | Public Relations | Speechwriting | Web Content | Government Communication | Tips & Tactics | Hot Topics | Back to Top
MyRagan | MyManageresNetwork | MyRaganTV | Blogs | Podcasts | Jobs | Forums | eNewsletters
About Us | Copyright 2010 Ragan Communications, Inc. | Privacy Policy | Search | FAQ | Contact Us | Store | RSS RSS | Widgets | Site Map