shopping cartCART
Share |
MORE ARTICLES ON HOMEPAGE >>
Posted On: 7/20/2009

10 fundamentals of good writing
By Jim Ylisela

How to help your writers avoid the pitfalls that make most corporate writing dull, uninspired and convoluted

Writers are second-class citizens in the corporate world.

To be a writer is to be a peon on the almighty org chart. Better to be someone with a much fancier-sounding title, something like internal communicator or communications partner or, best of all, strategic communications specialist. Now that really sounds like something. I don't know what, exactly, but something.

Being a writer, it seems, doesn't make the grade in most companies. Yet good, clear communication is the one skill that organizations can't do without, and one that always seems in short supply.

Why? Two reasons: No one has made strong writing a priority, or the people doing most of the writing aren't very good at it. Combine the two and you have an organization that struggles to get its messages across to employees, customers, media, investors and anyone else who might be listening. And that's just not good business. Here's worse news: If you're a communications executive, this is your fault.

Don't get me wrong. I'm all for communications people being strategic thinkers and valued counselors who advise executives how to frame the mission, shape the message, engage the work force and commune with customers.

But it all begins with words, and when words fail to inform, motivate and, yes, even inspire, the best strategies crumble. What good is a vital message if no one hears it? What value is the mission if people don't understand it?

The problem with so much corporate communication today is not a lack of strategy, but an absence of voice. Vivid and unique voices. Voices that tell a company's story—about its people and its products and its place in the world—in a way that others might find compelling.

Why have companies lost their voice? The biggest reason is fear. Good communication can't thrive where every word is second-guessed and scrubbed of all meaning.

We've got to get back to good writing, and it's up to communication executives like you to make it happen. You can start by encouraging that your folks practice 10 fundamentals of good communication. They can help your writers avoid the pitfalls that make most corporate writing dull, uninspired and convoluted.

1. Push for specificity. Corporate writing is generally too vague, so you should invoke E.B. White's Rule No. 16 from The Elements of Style: "Prefer the specific to the general, the definite to the vague, the concrete to the abstract." (And while you're at it, buy your writers the book.)

Instead of the abstract, demand writing that is about something we can grasp. Don't tell us we have special challenges to confront; share with us the specific problems we face and how we're thinking of solving them. Don't praise people for their extraordinary contributions to the general welfare of the company or their untiring determination to go the extra mile.
Those words are flat and stale. Tell us some stories about people who have done something to push the company forward. Focus on the interesting, not the mundane.

2. Use more words. There's a bunch out there waiting to be plucked from obscurity and entered into the corporate lexicon. Companies use the same words over and over, and many of them have lost their meaning. How often can you talk about quality before it loses its panache? If everything is strategic, then what isn't? Are some decisions "key," while others ignored?

We are stuck in the language of corporate life. English gives us anywhere from 250,000 to 1 million words to express ourselves, but it feels like most companies keep using the same 12. It's time to stretch our vocabularies; reward any kind of corporate communication that breaks away from the everyday.

3. Find better verbs. This is where the language really fails most corporations. Companies talk to each other, and their customers, in stilted, dry language; and verbs are the biggest culprit. Strong verbs drive sentences; dull verbs slow them to a crawl.

The problem is that companies are using the same verbs to explain everything. We're leveraging our synergies. We're implementing core competencies. We're facilitating strategic processes to focus on our key deliverables. What does that mean? Turn your writers loose; order them to use action-oriented verbs that paint a picture. Make everyone read the front page of the Wall Street Journal, collect the verbs that power those terrific
sentences.

4. Pursue the active voice. There's no reason to write like a lawyer, tucking away the subject of a sentence so no one knows who did what to whom. You could argue that passive construction is a direct violation of the company mission, for it fails to take any responsibility for its actions.

Make it a rule that writers turn their sentences around and focus on the subject+strong verb+object construction. Active writing is faster and cleaner, and it requires fewer words. This one simple act instantly lifts your writing out of its lethargy.

5. Omit needless words. Not only are we choosing the wrong words or the same words, we're using too damn many of them. Most corporate writing could stand a decent haircut.

Here's a little test: Count the number of words in your story, print it out and then cut it by 10 percent. Don't take out any useful detail or information; remove only words that didn't have to be there in the first place. Then, take a hard look at your first sentence. Make it shorter. That first paragraph needs to give your readers a running start.

6. Embrace simplicity and clarity. This is a biggie. People in companies want to look and sound important, and somewhere they got it into their heads that the best way to do that is to use a lot of big words and convoluted phrases. There's an entire industry organized around this notion, leading to hundreds of "success" books that use goofy metaphors to describe how businesses should operate.

It's all nonsense. The best way to communicate, from the Bible to the blogosphere, is through clear, simple, conversational language. Get rid of the hype, ban the corporate speak, say what you mean and mean what you say. Clarity begets productivity and innovation. Simplicity leads to better understanding, which leads to engagement. Period.

7. Tell a good story. Many companies have lost the art of storytelling, even though every organization is filled with compelling tales of people doing good work, overcoming barriers, and treating each other (and the customers) with care and respect. But instead of real people doing interesting things, we get a combination of general platitudes ("Thank you for your hard work!"; "Our employees are our greatest asset!") and vague admonitions. ("If we each push a little harder, we can meet our third quarter goals"; "We're facing some tough challenges, but if we work as a team we can turn them into opportunities").

Those are meaningless statements, and not very motivational to those who bother to listen. It's your job to dig out real stories and give your organization some human voices. People like to read about people; they don't want to read about programs, processes or policies. Find the people who are working the programs, carrying out the new process or affected by the policies—and tell their stories.

One good anecdote will keep readers interested.

8. Find some interesting voices. Everybody in the corporate world sounds the same, and frankly, it's boring. The quotes we use in press releases, the way our leaders address the troops, the way we write our newsletters and intranets: BOOORRRING. You can change this right away by demanding that people talk like, well, people.

Make no mistake. The burden is on the communicator. It's your job to make people comfortable enough so they can be themselves and talk the way they normally do, instead of lapsing into some kind of mind-numbing corporate chant we've all heard before. Quotes are the best way to illustrate the talented, dynamic people working at your organization. They've got something to say, but it takes a good conversation to coax it out of them. Make sure your interesting people are saying interesting things.

9. Take some chances. This is actually easy, since taking a chance in most companies hardly requires doing anything radical. It just means looking for a different way to tell a story.

Writing about customer service? Do a story about the top 10 ways the company to lose a customer. Employees have questions? Start an intranet column called the Rumor Mill, where people can get straight answers to business questions. Think about your audience and what gets their attention, then craft your communication to match. People want to be entertained as well as informed. Have some fun.

10. Rewrite everything. All of the above rules won't get you anywhere if you don't impose the biggest rule of all: Good writing evolves, and it happens only when so-so prose is made better through rewriting.

If you can do one thing for your writers, it's this: Liberate them. Tell them it's OK to write complete crap the first time out, because they've got to get something on the screen first, then make it better. No one writes perfect sentences in their heads. Write it once, rework it, then write it again. That's the magic formula, and it's the only way to make sure you've followed Rules 1 through 9.

Article comments:
Monday, July 20, 2009 9:56:40 AM by Robin Brown
Good article (comment pays particular attention to rule six).
Monday, July 20, 2009 10:06:10 AM by John
In my experience, it's not the writers who screw up communications. It's the VPs and managers who vet what writers submit who turn it into corporate-speak. Call it writing by committee, but it sucks the creativity out of everything.
Monday, July 20, 2009 10:15:02 AM by Robert E. Brown
I'm using these pieces on writing and PR, etc., in my classes at Salem State, where I'm Professor of Communications, and at Harvard Univ. Extension School, where I've taught a writing-for-PR and Marketing course for 20 years.

You're right: Writing is writing is writing. The fundamentals haven't even really been significantly changed by the requirements of the digital era. It wouldn't have taken Homer or Aristotle or Shakespeare very long to learn how to write for the web.

What takes a lifetime is to continue working to write better, more articulately, more compellingly, more accurately. But as the poet Eliot wrote somewhere in "The Four Quartets," words crack apart, fall out of place and just won't stay put (I paraphrase). If the great poet confesses in his celebrated maturity that writing's a tough gig, then surely we PR, marketing and social media types ought to be honest and humble about writing.

But I do like your refusal to disconnect writing for PR from writing, itself.

Before the last quarter century I've spent as an academic and consultant, I was a speech writer for ARCO and W.R. Grace & Co, and a marketing manager at PriceWaterhouseCoopers (then Coopers & Lybrand).

Monday, July 20, 2009 10:22:19 AM by Scudman
100% agree with John. Many times I've seen a great, creative article be struck down by VPs who know nothing about communications or lawyers that neuter the piece until it becomes useless as a communication piece. Your top 10 list is excellent, something I'll forward to my comms team & friends.
Monday, July 20, 2009 10:27:30 AM by Ginger
Jim, this is one article I am going to print and refer to for years to come. You have wrapped up 10 years of corporate communications experiences into a single article. Well done and thank you!
Monday, July 20, 2009 10:35:39 AM by Kirk Hazlett, APR
Many thanks to Jim for so concisely stating what I hammer into the heads of all my PR students at Curry College. In particular, I focus on the "good story" and "interesting voices." Readers don't want to hear...again...the pontifications of the executive suite. One of my personal favorites from years ago was a story I did on a US Army soldier/world-class chess player that emphasized the many unnoticed talents possessed by a group of hard-working, often unappreciated professionals?
Monday, July 20, 2009 11:03:57 AM by Anonymous
All very good comments. I especially agree with John. The 'powers that be' like big words and convoluted sentences. Reason? They figure that if it sounds too simple, basic, straightforward, that others will think they are not really accomplishing much. Also, if others understand what they're doing (heaven forbid), it breaks down the elitism that comes with hierarchy.
Monday, July 20, 2009 12:10:48 PM by Ed George
Thank you Jim. I needed this article today to pick me up and give me courage to charge back into the war against lazy, dull writing in the association PR arena. This is Bible material for interns and others starting out and a great refresher for the typewriter generation of writers too.
Monday, July 20, 2009 12:55:12 PM by Julie S.
Even with extensive education, training and practice writing professionally, I found this article refreshing and useful. I would suggest, however, one small revision and one addition.

Revision:
The second point, use more words, was a little jarring at first. It led me to believe you were suggesting that writers should increase the number of words they use (instead of increasing the variety of words used).

Addition:
I would add one more point (so it would be 11 fundamentals of good writing): Know your audience. No matter how active your voice, how concise your prose or how compelling your story, if you don’t start with a good understanding of who you are trying to reach, your piece is in danger of failing before you write the first draft.
Monday, July 20, 2009 1:12:38 PM by Reese Nank
In my 20+ years of corporate communications experience, I found that the reason executives prefer vague writing is they do not wish to be held accountable for what appears on the page. Whether it is a problem (which most won't admit they have) or a solution (that may not solve it), once it is in writing, the Board or their bosses can question their actions. Many execs blame their vagueness on proprietary information or company secrets, but I believe it is their careers they are protecting.
Monday, July 20, 2009 3:39:13 PM by Anonymous
A little ironic here. Item number 9, second paragraph, second sentence. Does it make sense to you?
Monday, July 20, 2009 5:24:18 PM by James Kerwin
Very helpful advice. It is an ongoing challenge to produce fresh reading material. The trick seems to use more new words, buzz words if you like, but at the same time, eliminating useless words.
Wednesday, July 22, 2009 2:21:48 PM by Multilanguage Melvin
excellent
excelente
tres bien
bravo
hao

domo arigato
melvin
Wednesday, July 22, 2009 9:07:17 PM by Donna Legendre
Jim,
Loved it lots. YOUR voice comes through the piece. I can just hear you saying "mind-numbing corporate chant."

Comment on this article
 
Your name
 
Name 
E-mail 
All the fields are optional
Ragan.com moderates comments and reserves the right to remove posts that are abusive or otherwise inappropriate.
 
Type the characters you see below.
 
RELATED STORIES
RELATED PRODUCTS

Home | Internal Communication | Public Relations | Speechwriting | Web Content | Government Communication | Tips & Tactics | Hot Topics | Back to Top
MyRagan | MyManageresNetwork | MyRaganTV | Blogs | Podcasts | Jobs | Forums | eNewsletters
About Us | Copyright 2010 Ragan Communications, Inc. | Privacy Policy | Search | FAQ | Contact Us | Store | RSS RSS | Widgets | Site Map