shopping cartCART

Posted On: 1/13/2009

'We need to fix our CMS,’ say communicators in new poll
By Michael Sebastian
michaels@ragan.com

To gain more control over content, most communicators are changing their content management system (CMS), according to our new poll
 
Tired of the content management system (CMS) powering your company’s intranet or Web site? You’re not alone.

Who took the poll?
The poll asked 396 communicators questions about their current or future CMS. Weighing in were communicators from North America, Europe, Africa, Australia and New Zealand.

A poll conducted by Ragan Communications and PollStream found around 70 percent of respondents plan to change their CMS in the near future or have recently adopted a new system. Communicators want software that easily allows them to control how and when content is posted to their intranet or Web site, the poll showed.

“Your poll … fits with just about every client I've ever worked with,” said Chris Clark, vice president of v-Fluence, a Web-centered marketing and public relations firm. Most of his clients want their systems to be more user-friendly, Clark added.

In many organizations communicators are responsible for creating content, while someone else—usually a Web or IT specialist—puts it online. However, communicators increasingly are charged with posting content themselves and in need of user-friendly software.

That newfound responsibility has communicators adopting or eyeing enterprise software like Microsoft SharePoint as their CMS, despite some warnings that SharePoint is difficult to master.

Why the need to change?

Thirty-six percent of respondents said they are planning to change their CMS soon and 35 percent indicated they made a switch in the last year. Sixteen percent of respondents said they do not have a CMS; 13 percent are happy with their current system.

Among communicators planning to soon switch to a different CMS, one-half said they wanted one that’s easier to update and maintain, while 47 percent indicated their current system is outdated and clunky.

Thirty-seven percent are making the change to incorporate social media tools and 22 percent said IT controls when the CMS is changed.

Results were similar among respondents who already changed systems: 39 percent wanted an easier system and 37 percent indicated their old one was clunky. About one-quarter said IT made the decision about changing systems and 21 percent wanted more social media tools.

What CMS do communicators use?

Of communicators who changed systems or created their first CMS in the last 12 months, 30 percent chose Microsoft’s SharePoint while 4 percent went with Wordpress. The majority of respondents—55 percent—were scattered on their choice of CMS.

For instance, numerous respondents listed enterprise software such as Ektron, Red Dot and Confluence as their current CMS. Several others mentioned custom-built systems or open source programs such as Joomla and Drupal, which allow programmers to open the software’s backend and make changes to it. Unlike enterprise software, open source is free and downloadable on the Web.

Two Web developers Ragan interviewed said they’re seeing more custom-built and open source systems than in past years.

“One of the trends I have seen over the last year in the technical world is that it’s becoming easier and easier to build a customized CMS,” said Peat Bakke, a Web developer in Portland, Ore. “It’s not drag-and-drop easy (you still need a developer), but it certainly costs less and takes less time to do than it did three years ago.”

Amanda Steinberg, CEO of Soapbxx, a Web solutions consulting firm, similarly noted that three years ago the landscape was different for open source.

“Open source CMSs (like Drupal and Joomla) are … rapidly emerging as a ‘must be considered’ … even more so in large corporations than ever before,” she explained. “This is very different from three years ago.”

Communicators share views on SharePoint

The data suggests SharePoint is gaining popularity.

“No one ever got fired for deploying Microsoft,” Steinberg quipped.

Among respondents planning to change their CMS, 56 percent said they will select SharePoint. Forty-two percent listed other programs or indicated they had yet to choose a CMS.

Only 10 percent of respondents planning on switching said they currently use SharePoint, while 3 percent use Wordpress. The remaining 83 percent of respondents listed a variety of different systems, including several communicators who mentioned Vignette.

Clark has mixed feelings about SharePoint.

“I don't feel comfortable saying SharePoint is a bad setup,” he told Ragan.com. “I think it's just very complicated and best left to heavily trained and supported IT-capable people.”
 
What about the happy few?

Despite warnings about SharePoint’s usability, 30 percent of communicators who are happy with their current CMS are using it. Twelve percent of satisfied users mentioned the IBM platform Websphere and 2 percent indicated Wordpress.

Both Clark and Jack Leblond, a former Web developer, recommended Wordpress due to its relative ease of use. “Wordpress is ideal, especially for small businesses,” Leblond said.

The 55 percent of respondents who said they do not use SharePoint, Websphere or Wordpress listed a variety of enterprise, open source and custom-built programs.

Two-thirds of these respondents said they’re happy with their current CMS because it’s easy for them to update and maintain; 41 percent indicated their system meets IT security standards; 21 percent said it incorporates social media tools; and 19 percent cited its intuitive navigation and design. Respondents were asked to check all answers that apply.

When asked “Why are you happy with your current CMS,” a few communicators suggested they are resigned to it. For example, one respondent, echoing the comments of two others, said, “Not necessarily happy, but it's what we have for now.”

PollStream has partnered with Ragan to create POLL-arized, a series of polls about corporate communications. PollStream is a leading provider of interactive engagement and community building solutions for Fortune 1000 organizations. Its proprietary poll, quiz, commenting, rating and The Hive solutions engage, educate and inform customers and employees online. For more information, please visit: www.pollstream.com.

Article comments:
Tuesday, January 13, 2009 10:34:15 AM by Susan
It's important to remember that there's a tradeoff between flexibility and ease of use. Beyond what's necessary for consistency and best practices, the more restrictive a template in a CMS is with content, the easier it will likely be to use. If you have multiple users (one of the benefits of a CMS) some will always say, "it's too restrictive" while others say, "it's too complicated." We're happy with our CMS from Leepfrog ease of use, approval options and customization.
Tuesday, January 13, 2009 11:15:50 AM by Anonymous
Sharepoint - blah...
Tuesday, January 13, 2009 12:18:01 PM by Chris
Personally, I hate SharePoint. It's typical Microsoft, bloated, counter-intuitive and expensive.

We're currently using DotNetNuke, which also sucks.

Why is it so hard for someone to develop an easy-to-use, flexible CMS that adheres to accessibility standards? WordPress comes close, but is a bit limited for larger Web sites like mine.
Tuesday, January 13, 2009 12:53:06 PM by Mary
I'm not sure I've ever met a communications pro who is satisfied with their CMS ... or , for that matter, an IT person who isn't convinced the same system is the best out there.

I think this is a classic case of the the grass always being greener elsewhere. I agree with Chris ... why is it such a struggle to find a truly intuitive, effective CMS?
Tuesday, January 13, 2009 2:58:13 PM by Matthew
I personally am not a fan of SharePoint. Any time one can get away from Microsoft, it can only be a good thing. I think there are several excellent open source CMSs out there, and those are what I'd be looking at if it were up to me.
Tuesday, January 13, 2009 9:12:08 PM by Fred deSousa
Comparing SharePoint with WordPress is like apples and elephants. Completely different apps for different purposes.

We currently use Documentum Web Publisher. Very flexible, robust, but a high learning curve.

For an easy to use, low-cost web site management program (note I did NOT say content management system), check out Article Manager 2.0.

Completely agree with the flexibility / ease comment. However, at some point communicators will have to understand that new media requires technical knowledge.

Writing a news release is hard to do well and the AP stylebook is arcane, but we all learned it (or should have). Same for new media.

Tuesday, January 13, 2009 10:42:55 PM by Cris
After using various CMSs such as one built in Cold Fusion to the latest release Sharepoint I would say - Tridion from Denmark is my fav. It is xml based, component driven content and fully accessible, flexible and under $300k.
Wednesday, January 14, 2009 1:32:51 PM by Scott Crevier
The core of this issue is the question "why change". The poll showed that "communicators want software that easily allows them to control how and when content is posted to their Web site." Are you serious? The respondents are just figuring that out now, several years after they've already implemented a CMS? I wonder what their needs were several years ago.

The problem is crystal clear then. Those companies chose the wrong CMS to start with. Any CMS worth anything is easy to use. Amanda Steinberg's comment, “No one ever got fired for deploying Microsoft,” is ludicrous. Microsoft is not for everyone.

One comment above says that "Sharepoint is bloated." I'm no fan of Microsoft, but if the features that make it "bloat" are useful to your company, then you should be considering Sharepoint. If you don't need all that, then don't use it. It's that simple.

The need for control over how and when to update web content is not new. This poll revealed nothing more than the fact that 70% of the respondents chose the wrong CMS to start with.
Wednesday, January 28, 2009 10:50:28 AM by Darren Luke
I've built two sites using Joomla, and am pleased with the functionality, adapabiltity, and sacalability. Although the ease of use is not perfect (inlcuding images on pages is wonky), I was able to train a technologically unsophisticated non-profit staff to add, edit & remove articles and create mass e-mail based on the content items. They are now self-sufficient from a content standpoint. I continue to do the maintendance and architecture changes.

The biggest problem with open source is the lack of formal support, so when the site crashes you don't have a vendor to blame or to come to your rescue. But there are an increasing number of dedicated open source consultants who are able to support your site in an ongoing relationship and give you the peace of mind you and your boss need.

Open source is definately worth examining.
Saturday, March 21, 2009 7:50:12 AM by Tomer Tishgarten
I wish that the author would have expanded on point regarding the custom built WCM solutions.

While custom build content management systems may be cheap in the short run, the web is fluid so marketers oftentimes return with new functionality demands to support their campaigns. In those instances, you'll have to develop an CMS upgrade and/or completely re-write the system. For a case in point, just research Twitter and their scalability issues. That's why it normally makes more sense to leverage a solution from CMS vendor that is focused on making their content management system relevant for communicators and marketers today and tomorrow.

Don't get me wrong, there are times when custom-built solutions make sense. These solutions are good for clients that play in a niche market and/or have a very specialized need. In fact, the system that is built for these clients is essentially a custom application with a simple front end to manage content.

Comment on this article
 
Your name
 
Name 
E-mail 
All the fields are optional
Ragan.com moderates comments and reserves the right to remove posts that are abusive or otherwise inappropriate.
 
Type the characters you see below.
 

Home | Internal Communication | Public Relations | Speechwriting | Web Content | Government Communication | Tips & Tactics | Hot Topics | Back to Top
MyRagan | MyManageresNetwork | MyRaganTV | Blogs | Podcasts | Jobs | Forums | eNewsletters
About Us | Copyright 2010 Ragan Communications, Inc. | Privacy Policy | Search | FAQ | Contact Us | Store | RSS RSS | Widgets | Site Map