How to land on the first page of a Google search
An expert on search engine optimization details how you can boost your site’s prominence
Your company or client should appear on the first page of a Google search.
“If so, you’ll get a majority of the traffic,” said John Spagnuolo, president of the New Media Institute. “If you appear in the second page or third page, good luck—only the people with patience will get to you.”
The interplay between two factors—content and credibility—is both simple and complex. It helps determine where your Web site lands on a Google search.
Content is fairly easy to understand; it’s what’s on your Web site. Credibility is the labyrinth of other sites linking to yours—and the credibility of the sites linking, in turn, to those sites. Part of what induces other sites to link to yours is, of course, the quality of your content.
Spagnuolo recently outlined these terms and their importance at Ragan’s “Communications in a Web 2.0 World” conference. He is a leading expert on search engine optimization (SEO), the tactics a site employs to improving its prominence on search engines such as Google. SEO applies to “organic” (unpaid) searches, not paid advertisements.
How do you determine your site’s credibility? Type “link:yourdomain.com” into Google. For instance, to check the links to Ragan type “link:ragan.com.” This search reveals the sites linking to you.
“This is what matters to Google,” Spagnuolo said. Yahoo offers a similar search.
Spagnuolo suggested downloading the Google tool bar. The Google page rank of each site you visit is on the tool bar. The higher the page rank, the greater a site’s credibility.
Remember, the credibility of sites linking to you also matters to search engines. One link from The New York Times Web site, which has countless sites linking to it, is more valuable than 100 links from different MySpace pages.
How do you build credibility? Get people to link to you, Spagnuolo said. One way is to call or e-mail people and simply ask.
How do you build credibility and links without calling people one by one? Issue a press release, Spagnuolo said. Wire services feed your press release to Web sites. If a link to your Web site is on the press release, and other sites post it, then Google recognizes the sites as linking to you.
“I don’t care if a journalist reads it,” Spagnuolo said. Google sees it.
If you don’t have a wire service, send a press release over PR Web, he noted. It feeds your release to numerous Web sites for a fee.
How do you hurt your credibility? You dilute it. For instance, companies will often launch a communications campaign that features an all new Web site.
Here’s the problem. If the campaign builds buzz, people are linking to the new site and not to your primary site, Spagnuolo said. Search engines don’t recognize the difference, and you’re stealing credibility from your main site.
Avoid link farms—they are where credibility goes to die. When people learn that links build credibility they often purchase SEO submission software. “A lot of them aren’t very good,” Spagnuolo said. Often this software feeds your site to link farms—the sites people land on accidentally that are packed with links. Google recognizes link farms, Spagnuolo said. Chances are, those links do not count toward credibility.
Upload all of your videos to YouTube and link to them. If your videos appear on YouTube, more people will view them and then possibly link to your site.
Content is king. So your page rank is high, but your site still appears low on search engines. What’s the deal? Something is amiss with your content.
Search engines send Web robots, called bots, to crawl over sites and catalogue key words. When someone plugs a word into a search engine, the Web sites that appear contain the words the bots found and catalogued. If the bot can’t recognize a site’s text, then it can’t collect keywords from it and the site’s search-engine position suffers.
Here’s what you can do to attract the bots.
Start by determining your keywords. What will your customers search? Find out and begin incorporating them into the text of your Web site.
Choose a domain name with care. Include a keyword or words in the domain name. If you’re selling pens, make sure “pens” is part of the your site’s domain name, Spagnuolo said. Keep the domain name as short as possible, avoiding hyphens, he added.
Create a site map. Search engines check site maps to learn where to look for content, Spagnuolo said. Make sure the site map is available from the homepage. It should be text-based and kept up to date.
Learn how to add content to your site. The ability to add content to your site gives you an opportunity to make tweaks, including adding keywords. If you’re relying on a Web or IT team to make updates, chances are your updates will lag. “In order to stay competitive online you need to have control of your content,” Spagnuolo said.
Add alt tags to pictures. Drag your cursor over an image on a Web site. An alt tag is the text that appears next to your cursor. It typically describes the picture. Search engines read alt tags. If a picture lacks an alt tag, a search engine sees a picture file—not text.
Make sure your titles are consistent. A title is the name of a Web page that appears at the top of Internet Explorer when you visit a Web site. Add keywords to the titles and make sure they are consistent, Spagnuolo said.
Check the length of your Web address. Long URLs are a waste, Spagnuolo said. (Here’s a place where Ragan.com can improve; look at your Web browser’s address bar right now.) Add keywords to the Web addresses of different pages within your site. Don’t let your Web team deter you, Spagnuolo added. “It is possible,” he stressed. “Don’t let Web content managers say it’s impossible.”
Avoid flash design—or else make sure your Web designer understands flash. If a designer fails to incorporate text into your site’s flash elements, search engines see only a jumble of code, not keywords.
Gauge your traffic. Visit www.google.com/analytics to sign up for Google analytics. Then track how many people visit your site and which pages they frequent most. Expand the portion of your site that receives the most traffic, Spagnuolo said. It will help attract even more attention to your site.


Mike Willett
http://www.willettcorpcomm.com
I think the most important observation I can make about the SEO advice given here is that there's "more to the story".
What we have here is a collection of general, often incomplete or poorly explained individual tactics. This is not to say it's all bad, not at all. There's good fundamental advice like the importance of links, keywords and content.
But there are other observations like using Google's link: operator (shows incomplete info) or the notion of link farms (flashback to 2001) or better, to avoid Flash (Flash isn't bad at all, it's the absence of text and independent link navigation that's a problem) that should leave readers wondering how up to date the advice is.
Amazon sells a ton of merchandise including books, yet "books" isn't in the domain name. Shortening web urls without careful execution of redirects can be DISASTEROUS.
There's some great fundamental advice in the article but a lot of the information is incomplete or simply outdated.
Better resources for SEO advice are:
http://www.seobook.com
http://www.searchengineland.com
http://www.searchenginewatch.com
http://www.seroundtable.com
http://www.seomoz.com
OR, you can peruse any of the 500+ SEO blogs that has been maintained for the past 3 years at: http://tinyurl.com/seoblogs
Kristen Kouk
www.bluebirdpublicrelations.com
1. The opening line - being on the first SERP is important - true. But only for a search term that has meaningful relevance to the audience you are trying to reach or influence. What is the point in being ranked number one for a term no-one is looking for? Or at least, that your target audience is not interested in?
2. "One link from The New York Times Web site, which has countless sites linking to it, is more valuable than 100 links from different MySpace pages."
This is not strictly true. Google ranks pages, not sites. If you actually checked the page rank of many of the New York Times pages, you'd find they have Page Rank 0. Big media sites have millions of indexed pages - I think if traffic figures for individual pages were revealed you'd find the volumes in many cases actually very low (you could argue that Page Rank is an indirect measure of traffic). By way of example, the New York Times Twitter feed has 1 million+ followers - yet if you look at the bit.ly stats for some of the story links there, the click throughs are sometimes barely into single figures. Yes, the site may have large numbers of visitors, but they will tend to gravitate to a small number of the total indexed pages.
Which is not to say getting big media web coverage is not worth the effort - like much in PR today, it is merely the start, not the end of the journey - no question that the New York Times or similar has trust and authority - however, you can't assume that people will necessarily gravitate towards content there - you need to help your audience get exposed to it eg referencing that content through various channels appropriate to your audience.
SEO is a moving feast - the resources Lee references should be required reading for PRs, not just search marketeers.