Why does one person see a glass as half full and another sees it as half empty?
The difference is more than attitude. We unconsciously experience things differently in our minds, often completely unaware of anything other than that something feels comfortable—or doesn’t.
Our brains use pattern recognition to manage and make sense of the enormous amounts of data they must process to keep us functioning. Understanding this process helps us to predict how others will act and to persuade or communicate more effectively with them. It also explains why they view the glass as half full or half empty.
Neurolinguistics is the study of how the brain understands and produces language, so it drives how we communicate with ourselves and how we process verbal input.
Becoming acutely aware of the words that we and others use opens us up to the inner workings of the brain and helps us to make the most of those natural processes to become more empathetic and far better communicators. To lead our colleagues and help our friends, we must understand individual mindsets and customize our language and approach for them.
Everyone has predominate patterns that drive how they communicate and respond to situations, so let’s take a look at the eight pattern filters and what they reveal to us about how to effectively communicate with others:
1. Direction: Toward or away from
Each of us is motivated to gain pleasure and avoid pain or loss-but one of those drives is a particular person’s primary mode. As leaders and coaches we need to understand our own filters and the filters of those we lead. To discover your own primary mode, or someone else’s, ask a question such as, “What’s important to you about work?” and pay close attention to the words used to answer. Those who prefer moving toward opportunities will talk about goals and what they want to achieve. Those who prefer to move away from will discuss avoiding risks or conflict, being cautious and safe.
2. Reason: Possibility or necessity
This pattern filter helps us understand why people take action. If asked, “Why did you choose your last project?” those who act on possibility will talk about the opportunity, choice or variety of the project. Those who primarily act out of necessity will refer to the step-by-step process of making their decision, the reason(s) they must do it and the importance of finding the exact solution before taking action.
[RELATED: Enter PR Daily's Video & Visual Awards to earn recognition for your captivating visual content]
http://www.ragan.com/rd/Y18CD0NY-PRINLN” target=”_blank”> Weave storytelling into every corporate communication, and craft copy that captures your brand voice.]
3. Frame of reference: Internal or external
Frame of reference explains how we judge our own actions: Do we reflect internally for that evaluation, or do we seek feedback externally? Those with an internal focus will require less feedback and recognition than those who are externally oriented. They might not even take feedback well. You’ll gain their respect if, when asked a question, you inquire, “What do you think you should do?” The externally focused need others’ validation and can be more easily persuaded to another viewpoint.
4. Convincer: Five senses and frequency
The convincer pattern demonstrates what a person must experience to become convinced of something. If you ask, “How do you know when a person is talented?” they will tell which of their senses must be triggered (“I need to see it, hear about it or be shown it”) and the frequency of that demonstration (once, two or three times, or continually). Use this information to frame your conversations with individuals, and your persuasion skills will be enhanced.
5. Relationship: Sameness or difference
The relationship filter helps us understand how relationships are built. Determining whether a person primarily sorts by looking for similarities or differences can be achieved by asking them to describe the relationship of certain items, such as coins. Do they highlight the similarities or the differences of the objects? Difference people don’t build rapport well and may have a problem with routines, relationships or job stability. Don’t tell them what to do-they’ll innately want to do the opposite. When teaching, show difference people all the exceptions first; help sameness people find productive routines.
6. Attention: Self or others
Attention focuses on how people show other people they’re paying attention. It’s a subtle pattern that you must observe. Self-sorters are all about themselves—they give little attention to what someone is saying until it directly concerns or interests them. Those who sort by others pay attention with eye contact and provide feedback when others are speaking. This is an important quality in service industries and group interactions. In the extreme, self-sorters can appear selfish, and those who sort by others can come off as martyrs.
7. Focus: General or specific
When we have a general focus, we’re big-picture, high-level-overview, forest-for-trees thinkers. We often speak in generalities and are quick to summarize ideas or points. Those whose primary focus is specific are motivated by details and sequences. They want precision and exactness and are trees-for-forest thinkers. When asked, “How do you solve problems?” do your colleagues answer with specifics or a summary?
8. Action: Active or reflective
The reason pattern (No. 2) helped us understand why people take action; this pattern helps us understand how and when people take action. Active sorters want to charge ahead immediately and get things done. Those who sort reflectively prefer to analyze, consider multiple options and wait until they fully understand a situation before acting. Responses to, “How do you learn new things?” will reveal people’s dominant pattern if we listen carefully to their word choices.
Michelle M. Smith is vice president of marketing at O.C. Tanner, and an international speaker and author on leadership, motivation and employee engagement. A version of this article originally appeared on TLNT.
This article first ran on PR Daily in April 2017.